Vintage Science Fiction Strikes Back!
Posted November 27, 2012
on:It is a dark time in the northern hemisphere. Although Black Friday has been survived, the upcoming holiday season drives bookworms from their hidden libraries, and pursues them across the galaxy. . .
Evading the dreaded TV toy commercials, a group of bloggers led by yours truly established a secret plan for January reading.
It will be known as Vintage Science Fiction month, and many vintage books will be read, into the far reaches of the blogosphere. .. . .
I suddenly kinda feel like watching Star Wars. hey, the first one came out before 1979, so it’s vintage. . . right?
Ok peeps, here’s the deal: A while ago I realized I was horribly underread in the classics of Scifi. Sure, the stuff is dated and sexist and clunky and sometimes the language is archaic, but damn if I don’t enjoy reading about Martians and black holes, and old Star Trek books and Jules Vernian adventures, and stories from back when everything was possible because no one knew what might not be possible. The more of the stuff I read, the more I liked it, but I was so distracted by new shiny stuff that, well, you get the idea.
So last January I hosted Vintage Science Fiction month, and a whole ton of ya’ll participated by reading Vintage-y stuff and blogging about it, and we linked it all together here. My definition of Vintage is anything before 1979, and my definition of Scifi is pretty loose: scifi, sci-fantasy, sword and sorcery, robots, magical swords, near future, far future, pulp scifi adventure, satire, War of the Worlds, Jules Verne, Mary Shelley. . .
And guess what? It was buckets and buckets of fun! I had the opportunity to read obscure out of print goodness, met a bunch of new blogger friends, researched some authors, worked and read my butt off, and had the best month ever! On a more serious note, I gained a deeper appreciation for books that were written in the last 30 years by reading what came before them. From a genre-evolution standpoint, it’s truly fascinating.
Vintage SciFi month was so much fun, in fact, that I’m doing it again this year! Same month, same channel, same badge. Start your countdown to interstellar adventure and link to your January reviews in the comments of the Vintage Scifi tab at the top of the page. But this time, there’s a twist. I’ve got some surprises up my sleeves for you!
comments? questions? thoughts? shout ’em out!
31 Responses to "Vintage Science Fiction Strikes Back!"

Look forward to participating again this year, rolling it in with The 2013 Science Fiction Experience, and especially looking forward to the surprises!!! I’ve been wallowing in a few classics of late, getting myself in prime mood for the January event. Glad you are doing it again. Count me in.
LikeLike


Yow, Red, what a cool project!
Vintageish, mostly forgotten now, cool for one reason or another, and probably massively unPC so be warned:
J.T. MacIntosh, THE FITTEST (obnoxiously sexist on about page two, but fabulous premise)
Anything by John Boyd but most especially THE RAKEHELLS OF HEAVEN and THE LAST STARSHIP FROM EARTH
Theodore Sturgeon, SOME OF YOUR BLOOD (you’ll guess the “surprise” ending by page fifteen, and you won’t be grossed out where you’re supposed to be, but the writing and characters hold up)
Anything by John Wyndham but especially DAY OF THE TRIFFIDS (which is the best one that most like his others) or CHOCKY(which is the best one that isn’t)
Of course read the Brunner Innis-mode tetrad (STAND ON ZANZIBAR, JAGGED ORBIT, THE SHEEP LOOK UP, SHOCKWAVE RIDER) if you haven’t already, but have a look at two of his earlier ones: THE TRAVELER IN BLACK and THE SQUARES OF THE CITY
If you have by any chance never read Frederic Brown’s MARTIANS GO HOME, well, do.
Anything by Clfford Simak but most especially CITY, ALL FLESH IS GRASS, and THE GOBLIN RESERVATION
If you haven’t, now’s the time: Bester’s THE STARS MY DESTINATION, Miller’s A CANTICLE FOR LEIBOWITZ, Asimov’s THE CAVES OF STEEL and THE NAKED SUN
And absolutely anything by Andre Norton or Poul Anderson from before 1970, but especially the cycles of stories surrounding THE ZERO STONE and THREE HEARTS AND THREE LIONS, respectively.
LikeLike


I believe the Best of Cordwainer Smith qualifies and, since you pointed me toward him…I’m in!
LikeLike


[…] It’s Vintage Science Fiction month again at Little Red Reviewer, so head over there and get your geek on! […]
LikeLike


[…] January 1st 2013 will be here before we know it and that momentous date will not only kick off a brand new year but will also signify the official start date of The Science Fiction Experience 2013 (details soon). This will be my 6th year hosting this two-month reading event that celebrates the joys of science fiction in literature and film/television. In addition January 1st marks the start of the second annual non-challenge hosted by Andrea (Little Red Reviewer), The Vintage Science Fiction Month. […]
LikeLike


I joined Carl’s Sci-Fi Experience last year and was sorry I didn’t join your Vintage Sci-Fi month. So, I’m in! Now I have to gather my books. 😀
LikeLike


[…] Red Reader is hosting Vintage Sci-Fi Month in January. Vintage is anything written before 1979. I have more than a few of those that I picked […]
LikeLike


Fortunately there’s lots of vintage science fiction in my TBR pile already. THis will work nicely with the TBR Double Dog Dare. Count me in!
LikeLike


[…] Vance tonight. January is Vintage Science Fiction month – as sponsored and encouraged by Little Red Reviewer on her blog. This is the second Vance novel I have read. Big Planet was first published in 1957 by […]
LikeLike


[…] review is part of Vintage Sci-Fi Month; not that I needed an excuse to read vintage science […]
LikeLike

November 27, 2012 at 10:10 pm
So, do these reviews have to be ones we’ve yet to write, or have written recently?
LikeLike
November 27, 2012 at 10:22 pm
Sorry, I should have specified better. this is a theme for January 2013, so the reviews need to have been posted on your blog during the month of January.
LikeLike
November 27, 2012 at 11:28 pm
Thanks for the response. I should have re-read the Jan 2012 notice, as that made it very clear. Sorry. I guess I’d better start reading something then. /tips hat
LikeLike