Childhood’s End by Arthur C. Clarke
Posted April 28, 2014
on:Childhood’s End by Arthur C. Clarke
published in 1953
where I got it: purchased new
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
There’s going to be some spoilers, because I don’t feel bad about spoiling a book that was published the year my Dad went into kindergarten.
The novel opens with a momentous event: the day the aliens come. Their giant ships hover over every major city, but they came in peace. Forced peace, actually. The Overlords announce they will be taking over all of Earth’s governments, they will be stopping all wars, stopping hunger, disease and poverty, they will be making sure us Earthlings live peaceful lives. This is the first step towards Earth joining a galactic community, and the Overlords have been tasked with making sure we take this first step. The Overlords give us no choice in the matter, and any earthly warlords or take it upon themselves to violently disagree are shamed into submission. No choice at all, really.
But no one has ever seen an Overlord, and humans aren’t known to be trustworthy of anything we can’t see. The Overlord spokesperson, Karrelen, tells us that in fifty years they will show themselves to us, it will take that long for us to be ready. And they were right.
Like Moses in the desert, plenty of people who saw the Overlord ships arrive were dead fifty years later. Two generations of children raised in the shadow of the Overlord ships, two generations who couldn’t understand why their aged grandparents shuddered to see that shadow. In fifty years, we were ready to see the Overlords, because during that time they had gone from novelty to benign mundanity, and who could possibly fear something that had always been just, well, sitting there?
There’s a reason the Overlords couldn’t just walk out their spaceships the first day they got to Earth, we would have destroyed them. Think of the most terrifying creature your imagination can come up with. They don’t look like that, at all. But they do physically resemble a creature which would have terrified humanity for much of our history – they look exactly like devils of dark ages mythology – horns, winges, tail, everything. But the Overlords turned Earth into a near utopia – disease, hunger, war, these are things of the past. It must only be coincidence that they physically resemble what humans have historically been taught to fear and hate.
Even with their strange and frightful looks, everyone is still on “team Overlord”. The interweaving plots follow a handful of people who come into contact with the aliens. We first meet George and Jean Greggson who run into an Overlord at believe it or not, a party, and experience the strangest possible seance. The story also follows Jan Rodericks, a man George and Jean meet at the party. Later, the story catches up with George and Jean after they’ve had children and moved to a commune.
This was the April book for my local scifi book club, and there was a lot of discussion about if this was an optimistic book, or not. My vote was that it wasn’t. Sure, it starts out all optimistic, with first contact with an alien species, and one that wants to help us! But at the end of the book, when the children take that irreversible step, I felt the entire had taken a turn for the dark, and that actually, it had been dark the entire time, we just never noticed. It’s like this: The Overlords say they are giving us a choice – take the step or don’t take it. But there was never any choice, it was all just clever manipulation to make us believe we were choosing what was best for us, and that manipulation left a bad taste in my mouth.
Did the Overlords enable us to stay children forever? Humans no longer dream of going to the stars, or even of going to the moon. Clarke could have never known it, but it’s as if Childhood’s End predicted the Millennials. Coddle your children and make everything easy for them, and they never dream of growing up, never yearn for it, will never run away from you or challenge you, will never become their own person.
The story was a fast and entertaining read, but there wasn’t much emotional range. Very rarely did I get the feeling that anyone was ever in physical danger. We get plenty of information about what happens to whom and when, but there’s never much about how that affects those people. A huge alien ship shows up in the sky, and for the most part, people just keep calm and carry on. I get that Clarke wasn’t going for traditional characterization, but that’s usually something I need to get maximum enjoyment out of a book. So nothing wrong on him, it was user error – I was looking for something that he just didn’t do. It’s like being mad there aren’t any Fabrege trebuchets (although that would hella awesome).
It’s been quite a while since I read 2001: A Space Odyssey, 2010: Odyssey Two or Rendezvous with Rama, so I’ll need to reread some of those before deciding where Childhood’s End falls in my Clarke favorites list. I also have a sneaky suspicion that Childhood’s End is one of those books that the first time you read it, you just don’t get it. And then you read it again a few years later, and things begin to make sense. And then you read it again a few years after that, and suddenly you understand why it is considered a classic.
Fun facts about Arthur C. Clarke (thanks Amazon.com!) – He was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II, and he was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize!
13 Responses to "Childhood’s End by Arthur C. Clarke"
Thanks for posting! I enjoy reading your reviews, and agree completely that Clarke has always been more concept oriented than character oriented. An old classic I still remember from my own childhood because it was one of the first new “alien contact” novels I read. It didn’t stick with me as much as it might have if the characters had felt more “real,” but because of the novelty of the idea (at the time), it remains on my list and bookshelf (albeit tattered and dog-eared).
Thanks again, and I look forward to more of your reviews.
Kerry Denney
Author of SOULSNATCHER (LazyDay Publishing, April 2014)
LikeLike
1 | nikki / ccg
April 29, 2014 at 3:43 am
This sounds really interesting. It also reminds me about how I felt about After Doomsday by Poul Anderson, which I read a couple of days ago. Basically, it was a good book, I guess, but didn’t have the things that I was looking for/enjoy the most. But you have def got my curious about reading this one.
LikeLike
Redhead
April 29, 2014 at 7:56 am
I haven’t read much Poul Anderson. so I should skip Doomsday?
LikeLike